CYBERMED LIFE - ORGANIC  & NATURAL LIVING

Drug: Amoxicillin

  • Adjuvant effect of vitamin C on omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

    Abstract Title:

    Adjuvant effect of vitamin C on omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

    Abstract Source:

    Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jan-Feb;54(73):320-4. PMID: 17419283

    Abstract Author(s):

    Chiao-Hsiung Chuang, Bor-Shyang Sheu, Ai-Wen Kao, Hsiu-Chi Cheng, Ay-Huey Huang, Hsiao-Bai Yang, Jiunn-Jong Wu

    Article Affiliation:

    Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS: To test the impact of vitamin C supplementation on triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. METHODOLOGY: A total of 171 H. pylori-infected patients were randomized to receive different one-week triple therapies, including 20 mg omeprazole, 1 g amoxicillin, plus the following twice daily: (1) 250 mg clarithromycin (C250 group, n=55); (2) 250 mg clarithromycin and 500 mg vitamin C (V-C250 group, n=61); (3) 500 mg clarithromycin (C500 group, n=55). Six weeks after treatment, the success of H. pylori eradication was assessed by a 13C-urea breath test. Each collected H. pylori strain was defined as either clarithromycin susceptible or resistant by E-test. RESULTS: The demographic background, clarithromycin susceptibility of H. pylori, and drug compliance were similar among the three groups (p=NS). For clarithromycin susceptible infection, the V-C250 group had a higher eradication rate than the C250 group (ITT: 85% vs. 68% and PP: 90% vs. 73%, p = 0.03), but had an equivalent rate to the C500 group (p=NS). For clarithromycin resistant infection, all three groups had a similarly poor eradication rate of less than 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Adding vitamin C to one-week triple therapy can reduce the dosage of clarithromycin, but preserve the high eradication efficacy for clarithromycin susceptible H. pylori infection.

  • Nonsevere acute otitis media: a clinical trial comparing outcomes of watchful waiting versus immediate antibiotic treatment.

    facebook Share on Facebook
    Abstract Title:

    Nonsevere acute otitis media: a clinical trial comparing outcomes of watchful waiting versus immediate antibiotic treatment.

    Abstract Source:

    Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1455-65. PMID: 15930204

    Abstract Author(s):

    David P McCormick, Tasnee Chonmaitree, Carmen Pittman, Kokab Saeed, Norman R Friedman, Tatsuo Uchida, Constance D Baldwin

    Article Affiliation:

    Division of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-1119, USA. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE:The widespread use of antibiotics for treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) has resulted in the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens that are difficult to treat. However, it has been shown that most children with nonsevere AOM recover without ABX. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, acceptability, and costs of a non-ABX intervention for children with nonsevere AOM.

    METHODOLOGY:Children 6 months to 12 years old with AOM were screened by using a novel AOM-severity screening index. Parents of children with nonsevere AOM received an educational intervention, and their children were randomized to receive either immediate antibiotics (ABX; amoxicillin plus symptom medication) or watchful waiting (WW; symptom medication only). The investigators, but not the parents, were blinded to enrollment status. Primary outcomes included parent satisfaction with AOM care, resolution of symptoms, AOM failure/recurrence, and nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to ABX. Secondary outcomes included medication-related adverse events, serious adverse events, unanticipated AOM-related office and emergency department visits and telephone calls, the child's absence from day care or school resulting from AOM, the parent's absence from school or work because of their child's AOM, and costs of treatment. Subjects were defined as failing (days 0-12) or recurring (days 13-30) if they experienced a higher AOM-severity score on reexamination.

    RESULTS:A total of 223 subjects were recruited: 73% were nonwhite, 57% were<2 years old, 47% attended day care, 82% had experienced prior AOM, and 83% had not been fully immunized with heptavalent pneumococcal vaccine. One hundred twelve were randomized to ABX, and 111 were randomized to WW. Ninety-four percent of the subjects were followed to the 30-day end point. Parent satisfaction with AOM care was not different between the 2 treatment groups at either day 12 or 30. Compared with WW, symptom scores on days 1 to 10 resolved faster in subjects treated with immediate ABX. At day 12, among the immediate-ABX group, 69% of tympanic membranes and 25% of tympanograms were normal, compared with 51% of normal tympanic membranes and 10% of normal tympanograms in the WW group. Parents of children in the ABX group gave their children fewer doses of pain medication than did parents of children in the WW group. Subjects in the ABX group experienced 16% fewer failures than subjects in the WW group. Of the children in the WW group, 66% completed the study without needing ABX. Immediate ABX resulted in eradication of S pneumoniae carriage in the majority of children, but S pneumoniae strains cultured from children in the ABX group at day 12 were more likely to be multidrug-resistant than strains from children in the WW group. More ABX-related adverse events were noted in the ABX group, compared with the WW group. No serious AOM-related adverse events were observed in either group. Office and emergency department visits, phone calls, and days of work/school missed were not different between groups. Prescriptions for ABX were reduced by 73% in the WW group compared with the ABX group. Costs of ABX averaged $47.41 per subject in the ABX group and $11.43 in the WW group.

    CONCLUSIONS:Sixty-six percent of subjects in the WW group completed the study without ABX. Parent satisfaction was the same between groups regardless of treatment. Compared with WW, immediate ABX treatment was associated with decreased numbers of treatment failures and improved symptom control but increased ABX-related adverse events and a higher percent carriage of multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae strains in the nasopharynx at the day-12 visit. Key factors in implementing a WW strategy were (a) a method to classify AOM severity; (b) parent education; (c) management of AOM symptoms; (d) access to follow-up care; and (e) use of an effective ABX regimen, when needed. When these caveats are observed, WW may be an acceptable alternative to immediate ABX for some children with nonsevere AOM.

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.