CYBERMED LIFE - ORGANIC  & NATURAL LIVING

Distant Healing

The effects of distant healing performed by a spiritual healer on chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Written by CYBERMED LIFE NEWS
facebook Share on Facebook
Abstract Title:

The effects of distant healing performed by a spiritual healer on chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract Source:

Altern Ther Health Med. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):30-4. PMID: 19472862

Abstract Author(s):

Kenjiro Tsubono, Paul Thomlinson, C Norman Shealy

Abstract:

CONTEXT: Many individuals suffer from various kinds of chronic pain. Some controlled studies on distant healing for chronic pain exist, but no definitive conclusion has been established.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of distant healing performed by a professional Japanese healer on chronic pain.

DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled study. SETTING: Holos University, Fair Grove, Missouri.

SUBJECTS: People suffering from chronic pain (not caused by clear organic diseases or that persists long after a reasonable period of healing following injuries or surgery) were recruited through local radio and newspaper advertising. Subjects were randomly assigned to a treatment group or control group using a double-blind procedure.

INTERVENTIONS: All subjects met the healer at the initial session at Holos University. At the session, a 20-minute group meditation was performed. The healer went back to Japan after the session and started distant healing only to the treatment group for a 2-month period. All participants were asked to meditate for 20 minutes every day during this 2-month period.

OUTCOME MEASURES: The visual analog scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire.

RESULTS: A total of 17 subjects were recruited, and 16 subjects completed the study. Comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment visual analog scale indicated a slightly significant effect of distant healing (P=.056). The Present Pain Intensity Scale showed significant improvement in the treatment group compared to the control group (P=.0016). The Pain Rating Index showed improvement in the treatment group, but the difference between both groups was not statistically significant (P=.12).


We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.