CYBERMED LIFE - ORGANIC  & NATURAL LIVING

Dietary Modification - Low Carbohydrate-Ketogenic

Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis📎

Written by CYBERMED LIFE NEWS
Attachments:
Download this file (Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice - A Meta-Analysis..pdf)Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice - A Meta-Analysis..pdf[Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice - A Meta-Analysis.]586 kB
facebook Share on Facebook
Abstract Title:

Anti-Tumor Effects of Ketogenic Diets in Mice: A Meta-Analysis.

Abstract Source:

PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155050. Epub 2016 May 9. PMID: 27159218

Abstract Author(s):

Rainer J Klement, Colin E Champ, Christoph Otto, Ulrike Kämmerer

Article Affiliation:

Rainer J Klement

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Currently ketogenic diets (KDs) are hyped as an anti-tumor intervention aimed at exploiting the metabolic abnormalities of cancer cells. However, while data in humans is sparse, translation of murine tumor models to the clinic is further hampered by small sample sizes, heterogeneous settings and mixed results concerning tumor growth retardation. The aim was therefore to synthesize the evidence for a growth inhibiting effect of KDs when used as a monotherapy in mice.

METHODS: We conducted a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis on all studies assessing the survival (defined as the time to reach a pre-defined endpoint such as tumor volume) of mice on an unrestricted KD compared to a high carbohydrate standard diet (SD). For 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria either a mean survival time ratio (MR) or hazard ratio (HR) between the KD and SD groups could be obtained. The posterior estimates for the MR and HR averaged over four priors on the between-study heterogeneityτ2 were MR = 0.85 (95% highest posterior density interval (HPDI) = [0.73, 0.97]) and HR = 0.55 (95% HPDI = [0.26, 0.87]), indicating a significant overall benefit of the KD in terms of prolonged mean survival times and reduced hazard rate. All studies that used a brain tumor model also chose a latestarting point for the KD (at least one day after tumor initiation) which accounted for 26% of the heterogeneity. In this subgroup the KD was less effective (MR = 0.89, 95% HPDI = [0.76, 1.04]).

CONCLUSIONS: There was an overall tumor growth delaying effect of unrestricted KDs in mice. Future experiments should aim at differentiating the effects of KD timing versus tumor location, since external evidence is currently consistent with an influence of both of these factors.


We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.